The correct dog education
described by Hartmut Decker (HD)
commentated by Ruprecht Schmidt

Surfing in the Internet I discovered an article concerning dog education, which everything exceeds, which I read so far over this topic.
There HD gives soon at the beginning a descriptive example of the necessary education already at the puppy age: Example: Dogs do not have to look for anything on children's playgrounds. That I can already arrange for a puppy, without pressure or force, only with patient and spit. A herdsman dog understands - jerk twitches -. Exactly regarded, HD says to nothing at all about how of the education, but only that he can do that allegedly. But for what it needs patience if its herdsman dog - jerk twitch - understands? Or whether spit the crucial is? Thus even if, I don’t like to spit my dogs for education!
HD continues to write that a young dog must learn, how one deals with children, because: those have f.e. no long hair and a close skin, but are substantially more sensitive. (meant children probably are with this description) Dogs understand that very fast, if one trains them.
How does HD make that? He does not write unfortunately.
A further exemplary example of its dog education follows reads: On the other hand also the dear small ones should learn , what one can assume a dog and which not. My wife and I did not fumble around our daughter also on the plate, therefore she never came on the idea to do with our dogs. And therefore never something happened, in order to call only one example.
That means nevertheless, one omits everything during the education of the children, so that these do not come on the idea, making corresponding with the dogs because otherwise which (also always) could happen - or? But our dogs do not eat also from the plate, there are which other one, in order to call only one example.
HD describes the demands, which HD regarding education and obedience make against its dogs, in such a way: We are absolutely content therefore then with our dogs, if they did somewhat completely without linen. For example there is a horse paddock with us. Those may not enter it, all the same whether the horses outside are or not. Our dogs obey that evenly without line.
Again HD does not write, why its or taught like he behaved dogs in such a way it to them. HD writes “obeys”! What do the dogs obey? Did HD suggest times evenly so casually that they should not go on the horse paddock and that to have it - jerk twitch - understood and to obey since then? Mind you even without line. Or HD has times briefly spat as the dogs on the paddock wanted? Which for an education!! There one can become only envious!

And HD continues to write: . . . ..and therefore we educate our two dogs, as described so far.
That would have to mean nevertheless, not at all, because HD wrote so far nothing over it, how he educates the dogs.
HD explains then also equivalent as follows: And so far also always folded. The reason in addition takes place immediately thereafter: Because we run without line and most time of the year in the darkness. And we come to each walk without stress again home.
Since HD lives in a village, he becomes then probably neither humans nor dog to meet and also with the horse paddock there is no problem, since one understands that no stress arises.Envying value! HD educated his dogs in such a way that they must separate only once on the day in the evening in the dark. That does not see then also none and it excites itself over the heaps of dog. Dark and none is there. On the other hand does not have also with spit always - jerk twitch - to function, because it after the evening staying in the house: . . afterwards our two go outside again with sagging line . . . .
From this one must close nevertheless that the dogs at the line must be led outside, because they do not go outside otherwise. And that HD must be absolutely dissatisfied in the reversal conclusion each evening with its dogs, because they do somewhat not completely without line. Thus to our two herdsman dogs legend I simply say” to sleep” and then they go standing on and approximately after outside in it enclosure (without line). That had to be practiced naturally only, called with and offered benefits. They had understood after a while .One does not have it as easily, if one does not spit in such a way, as HD do. Naturally I must open also still the door, because that I do not have taught them.
Somehow I did not understand with the education of HD during the reading yet. He gives then still another example of education as follows: During the education of our dogs we always included their literal curiosity. We have us f.e. somewhere sit down, they returned automatically to us. Thus they learned very simply, that(s) one simply does not knock off.
Genial method!! Simply sit down and the dogs do not run away. Automatically!! Simply ingeniously!!!

I yet did not understand, like HD makes now with the education and read on. In addition, the following remarks do not make me smarter: We are the opinion, if a dog does not have to be able to do somewhat, because we do not judge it necessary, needs one it also not to punish, if it does not implement correctly then such a thing.
I did not understand this statement now at all. That conclusion-corrode brings then nevertheless still the releasing realization!
HD writes: Meant is with it, the less education, the fewer problems.
Now I know, why HD only writes that he educated his dogs, but never writes, how he educated its dogs. Who has already gladly problems? On the village and in the evening in the dark thereby has probably no problems. Unfortunately we and many different live neither on a village nor can we go out only in the dark with our dogs and have our dogs therefore to educate already correctly.

HD made an error. He should have gone into the policy. There he would have been succesful. As he over all know and still in addition ever better than other one, that has already glamour. As he with much words does not say nothing at all, as he makes others only bad, like it everything makes better than other one, only never says as he do, how he throws with untruths around itself, therefore some politician would still envy him.