Dog Housing
Remarks of an alleged expert for dog attitude
out of www.per hirtenhunde.de/Haltung
from
Hartmut Deckert (HD)
To the statement others that herdsman dogs need allegedly a surrounding field, to which also different animals belongs, write HD literally:
Here 'all-clear' signal can be given, what a dog does not know, it does not need also.
This statement is nevertheless the largest nonsense, which one can introduce oneself in this regard. For a natural healthy development each dog needs regular contact with kind comrades, whom it does not logical-prove have can, if its surrounding field does not exhibit such animals.
Apart from the connection is this statement for itself -
what a dog does not know, it does not need also
- already completely wrongly. If that were correct, one would have to conclude from it, if the dog does not know fodder, needs also no fodder.
At the latest now everyone must notice, what gives HD of himself for a nonsense.
And what about the 'all-clear' signal.
After German linguistic usage is one 'all-clear' signal the abolition of a warning. But nobody warned forwards something here. For what thus 'all-clear' signal?
If HD has obviously something problems with the use of the German language, he should pull not in same thing over other, (with reference to a reader letter, s.Kaukasen Blättle 5/2005). Quotation HD:
My thinking went by that the people, which determined in the Pisa study could read and write, not nevertheless quite have less and less Germans correctly
HD tries also here to put its authority out, but meets himself with it. His statement is wrong. The PISA study is not concerned with the mentioned abilities of the German population, but with mentioned abilities from excluding 15 years old pupils and the mentioned reader letter does not originate from this group of pupils.
Why does HD use at all the expression 'all-clear' signal ? Since public 'all-clear' signals always take place from authorities (police, fire-brigade or other authorities ), HD probably tries an authority to mediate, which he does not have.
If one regards only these two expressions of HD, one comes to the conclusion that HD has neither knowledge nor authority, but gives only nonsense of himself .